When Customary Land Meets Capital: Indigenous Sovereignty, State Legality, and Agrarian Dispossession in Kajang, Indonesia

Authors

  • Eko Pratama Department of Sociologi Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Keywords:

Customary territoriality, Decolonial sovereignty, Indigenous land governance, Legal pluralism, Politics of recognition

Abstract

This article examines the agrarian conflict between the Kajang Indigenous community and a plantation concession operating under Indonesia’s Right of Cultivation regime. Moving beyond administrative explanations of overlapping land claims, it argues that the conflict reflects a structural reorganization of territorial sovereignty under concession-based agrarian capitalism. Drawing on critical ethnography, the study analyzes how customary land embedded in relational governance, social reproduction, and ancestral obligation is reclassified as “state land” and transformed into concessionary space. This juridical reclassification constitutes a contemporary modality of dispossession mediated through legality rather than overt coercion. The HGU regime functions as a legal technology that produces territorial abstraction, stabilizes capital accumulation, and institutionalizes hierarchical legal pluralism in which statutory sovereignty prevails over customary jurisdiction. Although Indigenous communities are formally recognized within national legal frameworks, such recognition remains conditional and does not redistribute territorial authority. Resistance in Kajang therefore represents not only opposition to corporate expansion but a political struggle over sovereignty and the authority to define land itself. By integrating Marxian political economy with decolonial theory, this article demonstrates that contemporary agrarian conflict in Indonesia is embedded in the operation of law and state-centered sovereignty. It concludes that meaningful decolonization of land governance requires structural transformation of concessionary regimes rather than procedural recognition alone.

References

Alfiyan, A., Jamin, M., & Firdausy, A. G. (2025). Reformulation Of Living Law Or Customary Law In Regional Regulations Of Districts/Cities Through A Constitutional Approach (Pp. 504–512). Https://Doi.Org/10.2991/978-2-38476-519-5_40

Ardilla, N., Said, D., & Indrijawati, A. (2025). Implementation Of Biodiversity And Environmental Sustainability Based On Kajang Culture (Pp. 3109–3117). Https://Doi.Org/10.2991/978-94-6463-758-8_258

Bauder, H., & Mueller, R. (2023). Westphalian Vs. Indigenous Sovereignty: Challenging Colonial Territorial Governance. Geopolitics, 28(1), 156–173. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577

Beckert, S., Bosma, U., Schneider, M., & Vanhaute, E. (2021). Commodity Frontiers And The Transformation Of The Global Countryside: A Research Agenda. Journal Of Global History, 16(3), 435–450. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S1740022820000455

Canfield, M. C. (2023). The Anthropology Of Legal Form: Ethnographic Contributions To The Study Of Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 48(1), 31–47. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Lsi.2022.19

Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., & Vaara, E. (2021). Maintaining Strategic Ambiguity For Protection: Struggles Over Opacity, Equivocality, And Absurdity Around The Sicilian Mafia. Academy Of Management Journal, 64(1), 1–37. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amj.2017.1086

Chawaremera, M. M. (2025). Displaced Belongings: Indigenous Identity, Customary Law And The Struggles For Recognition In Post-Colonial Migration Systems. Frontiers In Human Dynamics, 7. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fhumd.2025.1655777

Chigbu, U. E., Bendzko, T., Mabakeng, M. R., Kuusaana, E. D., & Tutu, D. O. (2021). Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration From Theory To Practice: Three Demonstrative Case Studies Of Local Land Administration Initiatives In Africa. Land, 10(5), 476. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Land10050476

Davis, D. E., & Müller, F. I. (2025). Deconstructing Sovereignty: (Non-)Life, Territorial Power And The Everyday Ecologies Of Hybrid Governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 13(6), 755–772. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/21622671.2025.2501082

Epstein, S., Enkvist, V., & Dahlén, M. (2025). Contesting The National Interest In Ecuador: The Role Of Rights Of Nature In Mining Conflicts. Journal Of Human Rights And The Environment, 16(1), 49–71. Https://Doi.Org/10.4337/Jhre.2025.0006

Fraser, J. A., Torres, M., Parry, L., Itaborahy, W., Frausin, V., Guerrero, N., & Aleixo, J. (2025). The Amazonian Common Use Territory: Pluriverse Or Insurgent Universality? Geo: Geography And Environment, 12(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Geo2.70043

Fuentes, C. A., & Fernández, J. E. (2022). The Four Worlds Of Recognition Of Indigenous Rights. Journal Of Ethnic And Migration Studies, 48(13), 3202–3220. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/1369183x.2020.1797478

Ghaddar, J. J. (2021). Total Archives For Land, Law And Sovereignty In Settler Canada. Archival Science, 21(1), 59–82. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10502-020-09353-W

Hartoto, A. S. (2025). Technologies Of Dispossession: Comparative Analysis Of Frontier-Making And State Power In Indonesia. The Journal Of Peasant Studies, 1–29. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03066150.2025.2549344

Issar, S. (2021). Theorising ‘Racial/Colonial Primitive Accumulation’: Settler Colonialism, Slavery And Racial Capitalism. Race & Class, 63(1), 23–50. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0306396821996273

Joshi, S. (2024). ‘Land For My Children’: Gendered Moral Economies, Social Reproduction And Resistance Against Land Grabs In Rural Cambodia. Journal Of Agrarian Change, 24(3). Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Joac.12586

Kaneko, Y., Kadomatsu, N., & Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Land Law And Disputes In Asia. Routledge. Https://Doi.Org/10.4324/9781003170600

Komari, K. (2025). Between Recognition And Exclusion: Indigenous Peoples’ Rights In Asia’s Development Policies. Asia-Pacific Journal On Religion And Society, 8(2), 62. Https://Doi.Org/10.24014/Apjrs.V8i2.37572

Kurniawan, K. F. B., Dharmawan, A. H., Sumarti, T., & Maksum, M. (2024). Territorialization Of Plantation Concessions: Customary Land Acquisition Process, Agrarian Fragmentation And Social Resistance. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2367259

Lima, A. G. M. De, & Soares-Pinto, N. (2024). Kinship With The Land And Indigenous Cosmopolitics Of Care. Estudos Avançados, 38(112), 173–194. Https://Doi.Org/10.1590/S0103-4014.202438112.010-En

Lund, C. (2025). Coding Regimes Of Possession. An Essay On Land, Property, And Law. Globalizations, 22(8), 1361–1376. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2343451

Lushombo, L. W. (2025). Ecological Sustainability For “Life On Land”: Wellspring Of Indigenous Knowledge. Religions, 16(3), 311. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Rel16030311

Malinda, R. (2025). Dispossession, Extractive Capitalism And Political Reactions From Below In West Papua. Journal Of Agrarian Change, 25(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Joac.70032

Meehan, J., & Pinnington, B. D. (2021). Modern Slavery In Supply Chains: Insights Through Strategic Ambiguity. International Journal Of Operations & Production Management, 41(2), 77–101. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/Ijopm-05-2020-0292

Mitchell, R. M. (2021). China’s Participation In The Second Hague Conference And The Concept Of Equal Sovereignty In International Law. Asian Journal Of International Law, 11(2), 351–371. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S2044251321000382

Montenegro De Wit, M. (2022). Can Agroecology And Crispr Mix? The Politics Of Complementarity And Moving Toward Technology Sovereignty. Agriculture And Human Values, 39(2), 733–755. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10460-021-10284-0

Ossome, L. (2021). Land In Transition: From Social Reproduction Of Labour Power To Social Reproduction Of Power. Journal Of Contemporary African Studies, 39(4), 550–564. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02589001.2021.1895431

Parissopoulos, S., Timmins, F., Mantzorou, M., Mpouzika, M., Adamakidou, T., & Papagaroufali, E. (2026). Exploring Practices During Nursing Handovers In Critical Care: An Anthropological Study. Nursing In

Critical Care, 31(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Nicc.70389

Peterson, D., Bedner, A., & Berenschot, W. (2025). The Perils Of Legal Formalism: Litigating Land Conflicts In Indonesia. Journal Of Contemporary Asia, 1–22. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00472336.2024.2440855

Riyanto, G. (2025). Indigeneity As A Sphere Of Differences: State Enclosure And Counter-Enclosure Of Rural Spaces In Indonesia. Anthropological Theory, 25(4), 440–464. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/14634996251313825

Scobie, M., Finau, G., & Hallenbeck, J. (2024). Land, Land Banks And Land Back: Accounting, Social Reproduction And Indigenous Resurgence. Environment And Planning A: Economy And Space, 56(1), 235–252. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0308518x211060842

Suchodolski, G. (2025). Land Governance In Brazil, 1500–2024: State, Society, And Legibility Tools. Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.5529278

Weißermel, S. (2021). The (Im)Possibility Of Agonistic Politics: The Belo Monte Dam And The Symbolic Order Of Dispossession. Geoforum, 126, 91–100. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Geoforum.2021.07.014

Yahya, A. S. (2025). The Recognition And Protection Of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Within The Framework Of Regional Autonomy In Indonesia. Natapraja, 13(2), 176–192. Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Natapraja.V13i2.84838

Yang, B., & He, J. (2021). Global Land Grabbing: A Critical Review Of Case Studies Across The World. Land, 10(3), 324. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Land10030324

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Pratama, E. (2026). When Customary Land Meets Capital: Indigenous Sovereignty, State Legality, and Agrarian Dispossession in Kajang, Indonesia. ULAYAT: Journal of Decolonization, Indigenious Studies, and Customary Law, 1(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://journal.otoritassemestasains.org/index.php/ULAYAT/article/view/2

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.