The Integration of Informal Institutions in Participatory Governance at the Local Level: A Case Study of Gowa Regency, Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the practice of participatory governance in regional development planning in Gowa Regency through an analysis of RPJMD, RKPD, and participatory forum documents. A qualitative approach is employed to explore how participation is constructed and the extent of its influence on policy. The findings indicate that the Musrenbang process has provided a broad space for participation, as reflected in the large number of community proposals, which are predominantly focused on infrastructure needs and the local economy. However, the participation that occurs tends to be procedural in nature and functions more as a mechanism for collecting proposals rather than as a deliberative process. Not all aspirations are translated into policy, as they are shaped by development priorities, budget constraints, and administrative considerations. Monitoring remains largely dominated by the government, while coordination shows a tendency toward centralized authority. Consequently, the resulting policies represent an adjustment between community aspirations and the existing policy framework. This study concludes that participatory governance in Gowa has not fully reflected an equal distribution of influence. Participation exists, but it is not yet decisive.